In My Time I’ve heard a few divas live in concert (Jessye Norman, Renée Fleming)—indeed, I’ve accompanied some (Monserrat Caballé, Cecilia Bartoli). In this blog I also praise outstanding male singers like Michael Chance and Mark Padmore.
In Italian the term divo is occasionally used, but elsewhere there’s no male equivalent of the diva, or the related femme fatale; both terms reveal male anxiety—dangerous, damaged women meeting (and luring men to) a bad end (cf. Lulu). Male behaviour, more intrinsically fatal, is not advertised thus. The chanteuse is a similar archetype. And the skewed language continues with prima donna—as if male performers are never temperamental, self-important, and demanding (yeah right).
Susan McClary opened the way for later unpacking of such stereotypes in both opera and popular music, such as Lori Burns and Melisse Lafrance, Disruptive divas: feminism, identity and popular music (2001). And the use of these terms in English adds xenophobia to sexism—our impeccable moral virtue threatened by these loose foreign women (“They come over ‘ere, with their dramatic genius, and their perfect control of phrasing and diction…”).
Anyway, “that’s not important right now” (Airplane clip, suitably in a post on solfeggio!)—
I can’t think when I’ve been so entranced by a singer (that’s the word we’re looking for!) as hearing Ute Lemper in concert at the Cadogan Hall last week. I thought I could consign her to a comfortable old Weimar pigeonhole, but her music is endlessly enchanting. Never mind that I wasn’t quite convinced by this latest project based on Paolo Coelho, with a world music sextet—she keeps exploring. Her sheer physical presence is irresistible—as with Hélène Grimaud, it’s an intrinsic concomitant of her musical magic. Audiences hang on her every breath, every inflection of her slender wrist… I’d love to hear her in a little jazz club.
As with Billie Holiday or Amy Winehouse, the variety of dynamic, timbre, and vibrato that “popular” singers can command is all the more moving by being deeply personal. Once again, I rarely find perfect distinctive vocal artistry in the world of WAM. They’re all building on their respective traditions, but it’s harder for WAM singers, more burdened by formality, to convey such intimacy. Of course, Ute Lemper is also somewhat polished and controlled—less destructive than Billie and Amy; that may make her slightly less moving, but it also helps her stay alive. Her stage presence is breathtaking.
Much more to relish on her YouTube channel.
For a recent incarnation of the femme fatale, see here.
Pingback: Yet more Mozart | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Sing… | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Learning the lingo | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Armchair ethnography: Chiswick | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Flamenco, 2: gender, politics, wine, deviance | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Flamenco, 3: the soul of cante jondo | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Roaming the clouds: Miranda Vukasovic | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Feminine endings: Madonna and McClary | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Europe: cultures and politics | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Gepopo: pa-pa-pa-panic | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Moon river | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Vera and Doris | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Killing Eve: notes and queries | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Guide to another year’s blogging | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: The soundscape of Nordic noir | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: In memory of Natasha | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Gender: a roundup | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Barbara Hannigan | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Denis Twitchett: more Tang drôlerie | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Women of Yanggao 3/3: singers | Stephen Jones: a blog