True story:
Applicants for the post of principal conductor of the LA Phil were asked to submit a list of works they’d like to conduct in their first season. Esa-Pekka Salonen’s list was full of pieces by challenging contemporary composers. At the interview, the chair of the board looked severely over his application, turned to him and said,
“I don’t quite know how to put this to you, Mr Salonen, but… here at the Phil, we prefer our composers… dead.”
This may still apply to a considerable extent within the echelons of WAM; yet ironically, when those dead composers were alive, the core repertoire was contemporary: baroque and romantic audiences came along expecting to hear new music.
For China too, as I show in Appendix 1 of my book Daoist priests of the Li family, I attempt not a normative reconstruction of some timeless ancient wisdom, but a descriptive account of ritual life within changing modern society. See Debunking “living fossils”.
For the great maestro Salonen, see also here and here. For more interview stories, click here.
Pingback: Learning | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Venice: life in a theme-park | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: The Proms: more Ravel | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Revolution and laowai | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Mahler 9 | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Musicking | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: This season’s Proms | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Robert van Gulik | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Areas of expertise | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Alternative Bach | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: The art of conducting: a roundup | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: Society and soundscape | Stephen Jones: a blog
Pingback: French slang | Stephen Jones: a blog
Reblogged this on Stephen Jones: a blog and commented:
Reblog (summary only: scroll down to click on “view original post”!):
This rebuke from the board of the LA Phil to maestro Esa-Pekka Salonen makes a revealing commentary on classical culture…
LikeLike