The Feuchtwang Variations

The wise and infinitely supportive Stephan Feuchtwang continues to inspire generations of anthropologists in China and worldwide (see also here) with his work on Chinese popular religion. He has just celebrated his 80th birthday—and so do we all!

Stephan's invitation edited

Design: Lotte van Hulst.

For the party at the Tabernacle (a great venue, and, um, marker of the changing territorial identities of West London religious life!) his wonderful family played some popular and moving musical items, with the assembled guests on kazoos (anyone have a funky collective noun for kazoos in English, or measure word in Chinese?). And following my little foray into a world-music version of Bach earlier this year, we did a warmup act as a heartfelt tribute to Stephan, essaying a little medley from the Goldberg Variations—with me on erhu (one of many types of Chinese fiddles) and Rowan Pease (unsung Lucy Worsley of East Asian popular culture, currently embroiled in the China Quarterly struggle for academic freedom) on sanxian banjo (or should I say friction chordophone and plucked lute?) [Nah, give it a restThe Plain People of Ireland].

Wong

Not Rowan, not playing the sanxian.

That makes a total of five strings—and all without a safety net. Since Bach never wrote for either piano or sax (shades of WWJD), if his music can sound great (to us) on those instruments, then why not erhu and sanxian, eh. We haven’t tried adding a kazoo yet, though. As I said in my intro:

Just imagine that the Italian missionaries, like Pedrini, [1] at the court of the Qianlong emperor in 18th-century Beijing had invited Bach for a sabbatical—and indeed Stephan, although that was perhaps a little before even his time… So we’re going to essay a little medley from what should now be known as The Feuchtwang Variations[2]

Since among Stephan’s many talents he is also a viola player (“Not a Lot of People Know That”), I can avail myself of a couple of the muso’s classic excuses:

It was in tune when I bought it…
and
I didn’t really study any place, I just sort of… picked it up… [for how I picked up the erhu, see under the fascinating story of Ray Man]

[studiously] After intensive research on the performance practice of both Leipzig and Beijing in the 1740s, I can now say with some certainty that…  it wouldn’t have sounded like this.
[Cf. John Wilbraham’s remark.]

If you enjoy this half as much as we do, then we will have enjoyed it twice as much as you.

See also Song of suffering.

Framed by the Aria (itself infinitely enchanting—molten, ethereal, suspended in time), we played the first variation (blimey), then numbers 18 and 25—a perfect selection, eh. Short of recording daily until Steph’s 90th birthday, we’re never going to play it to our satisfaction (editing this is a similar challenge to editing one of my voiceovers), so meanwhile here’s an almost-recognizable attempt, just to give you a flavour—It’s the Thought that Counts. Just think yourselves lucky we didn’t do the repeats. Take It Away (and don’t bring it back):

Stephen Jones (erhu), Rowan Pease (sanxian, vocals).
Recorded in Maidenhead, 14th November 2017.

“They said it couldn’t be done”—and they were right! (Cf. Bob Monkhouse).

Just to make our chinoiserie version sound a little less banal, try the opening of the Aria on Lego harpischord, and Pachelbel’s Canon on rubber chicken—differently charming…

Li Qishan band 2001
Li Qishan’s family shawm band, Shaanbei 2001.

Never having played the Goldberg Variations on a keyboard, I (like millions of others) am deeply familiar with it through recordings—notably that of the iconic Glenn Gould, of course. So at the age of 286 I’m almost in the position of a young player in a Chinese family shawm band, who begins to play the melodies on shawm after many years of aural experience (and let’s just be grateful I didn’t do an arrangement for large Shaanbei shawms—yet). Similarly, I hardly needed to consult Bach’s notation, except out of curiosity. At the same time, anyone playing the piece is inevitably conditioned by the experience of hearing Glenn Gould’s version.

We played the medley in F rather than G—less as a result of all my erudite research into 1740s’ pitch standards (not), but just because I like a lower tuning on the erhu.

Bach party

Blending with invisible singers to left of picture. Stephan in red on left. Photo: Cordelia Pegge.

For the ecstatic Variation 18 we recruited a backing band consisting of Stephan’s daughters Rachel and Anna, along with Harriet Evans (outstanding scholar of the status of women in China). I arranged some personal lyrics, often in a kind of verbal hocket, incorporating (in stave 3) anthropology (with a little jest on the challenge, for some of us, of mastering the abstruse nature of Stephan’s theory!), (in stave 4) his dear wife Miranda, and his love of cycling:

Goldberg Var 18 in G

For the recording, without vocal backup, Rowan and I take the upper parts wordlessly, in more ethereal vein. Do feel free to sing along with a partner of your choice (cf. the karaoke versions of Daoist ritual percussion in my film, from 24.09).

And then the slow and intense minor-key Variation 25 is just amazing. Here Rowan’s singing supplies further harmonic intensity, evoking Glenn Gould’s own occasional inadvertent vocals. [3] And with the sustained sound of the erhu, and all my one-finger chromatic slides (1st finger on the way up, 4th finger on the way down), it sounds even better—or rather, it could do in the right hands. Not unlike a Chinese ondes martenot—trad keyboards just can’t compete with the vocal quality of bowed instruments.

And OMG, how about this (for the theremin, click here):

Sure, our version goes a tad faster—again, not resulting from any holier-than-thou baroque authenticity, but because it helps the whole harmonic logic.

Among many fine harpsichord versions, here’s Scott Ross:

Returning briefly to the modern piano—Bach was of course performing and composing modern music, and maybe what appeals to me in Joanna MacGregor’s version is that it seems tastefully rooted in her whole experience of our own contemporary piano sounds. Here’s the hallucinatory final repeat of the Aria:

Still, Bach is amazing on tuned percussion too, like this:

It can also sound wonderful as a string trio:

And now I’m keen to hear Rachel Podger’s new arrangement with Chad Kelly:

For Uri Caine’s stuttering variation, see here.

All this wealth of divine music I offer in tribute to the great Professor Feuchtwang!

[1] For missionaries at the Qing court, see here. “They come over ‘ere, with their fancy harpsichords…”
[2] Maybe I can concoct a couple of Chinese musicians in 1740s’ Leipzig from the Bach archives. If north African wind players were active at European courts of the day, then why not… International cultural exchange, eh. Note also Bach and Daoist ritual—not least Li Manshan’s classic remark.
[3] This encomium could come in handy for Rowan’s CV: “Less irritating than Glenn Gould”—Dr S. Jones.

42 thoughts on “The Feuchtwang Variations

  1. Stephen Feuchtwang, one of the great scholars that inspired me for my research. Wish I was there for the celebrations. Thanks for this post.

    Like

  2. Pingback: Recording and editing | Stephen Jones: a blog

  3. Pingback: Sacred river | Stephen Jones: a blog

  4. I suppose a cacophony of kazoos is too obvious – maybe a casualty?
    Couldn’t get your rendition on my iPod unfortunately – will try on the computer later…

    Like

  5. Pingback: Barbed comments | Stephen Jones: a blog

  6. Pingback: New Bach for fiddlers! | Stephen Jones: a blog

  7. Pingback: A Bach retrospective | Stephen Jones: a blog

  8. Pingback: More Rachmaninoff | Stephen Jones: a blog

  9. Pingback: Guide to a year in blogging | Stephen Jones: a blog

  10. Pingback: A brief guide to Chinese fiddles | Stephen Jones: a blog

  11. Pingback: Myles: a glowing paean, or The life of O’Brien | Stephen Jones: a blog

  12. Pingback: Ritual in The dream of the red chamber | Stephen Jones: a blog

  13. Pingback: Echoes of the past 1 | Stephen Jones: a blog

  14. Pingback: Echoes of the past 2 | Stephen Jones: a blog

  15. Pingback: At home with a master Daoist | Stephen Jones: a blog

  16. Pingback: Notes from Beijing, 2 | Stephen Jones: a blog

  17. Pingback: Guo Yuhua: Notes from Beijing, 3 | Stephen Jones: a blog

  18. Pingback: Festivals: the official—folk continuum | Stephen Jones: a blog

  19. Pingback: WAM on the erhu | Stephen Jones: a blog

  20. Pingback: An orchestral classic | Stephen Jones: a blog

  21. Pingback: Yanggao personalities | Stephen Jones: a blog

  22. Pingback: Gepopo: pa-pa-pa-panic | Stephen Jones: a blog

  23. Pingback: A rare duet for qin and erhu | Stephen Jones: a blog

  24. Pingback: Different values | Stephen Jones: a blog

  25. Pingback: Musical cultures of east Europe | Stephen Jones: a blog

  26. Pingback: Strings and voices | Stephen Jones: a blog

  27. Pingback: Musicking at the Qing court 1: suite plucking | Stephen Jones: a blog

  28. Pingback: Musicking at the Qing court 2: Pedrini and Amiot | Stephen Jones: a blog

  29. Pingback: Music cultures of imperial north China | Stephen Jones: a blog

  30. Pingback: Fiddles and racism | Stephen Jones: a blog

  31. Pingback: Alternative Bach | Stephen Jones: a blog

  32. Pingback: Bach,um, marches towards the world | Stephen Jones: a blog

  33. Pingback: Reception history | Stephen Jones: a blog

  34. Pingback: Training Daoists in Shanghai | Stephen Jones: a blog

  35. Pingback: Suzhou Daoists, England 1994 | Stephen Jones: a blog

  36. Pingback: Out-take | Stephen Jones: a blog

  37. Pingback: Pachelbel’s capon | Stephen Jones: a blog

  38. Pingback: The temple of memories | Stephen Jones: a blog

  39. Pingback: A new handbook on religion in China | Stephen Jones: a blog

  40. Pingback: Better than ever: more Bach | Stephen Jones: a blog

Leave a comment